Ahead of full data collection, a brief screening process is carried out on the mounted crystal to gain some preliminary information on the crystals and check they are suitably diffracting. Short bursts of X-rays, typically upto 30 seconds are used, with the power steadily being ramped up until a suitable diffraction pattern is observed. The crystal is kept in a single position during this step, unlike the full data collection where the crystal has data collected from many orientations.
A screenshot of the diffraction observed during the crystal screening stage.
The crystallographer is looking for a good number of diffraction spots, over a range of angles, especially at high angles, with the spots having good intensity (bright spots), with a concise form (not elongated or streaked)
Peaks fit -> info
How many of the spots give this same unit cell. Rare to be 100%
From the initial screening, this will generate a unit cell. Obtaining the shape and dimensions (a,b,c and alpha, beta gamma) and the volume.
This unit cell data is then matched to any entries in the CSD and to locally collected data.
Checking that these are chemically meanigful if matching, coincidence of unit cell v same compound.
From the volume, and the crystal shape, this gives a rough indication of how many atoms are likely to be in this unit cell. Either one molecule, or n repeat, and could include solvents of crystallisation.
Calculating how many frames (measurements) required in order to obtain a complete dataset.
Frames is each individual location of detector in relation to the X-ray beam.
Symmetry could rule out needing to collect many angles, as this data would already be available from data collected from earlier places.
The crystallographer can then alter the minimum level of parameters which have been calculated for data collection. The crystallographer could then override:
Time of data collection per frame (0.05 seconds is the fastest, to a maximum of 1 second being generally the upper limit
Symmetry v full sphere
Whether to collect for resolution of chirality (changing hkl and -hkl from being equivalent)
Setting parameters where a crystal is strongly suspected of being a twinned crystal
Options to collect additional redundant data
Altering any of the above will affect the data collection time, and these need to be balanced.
Inputting information on the expected compound is also provided at this stage, which allows the programme AutoChemSolve to attempt to determine the structure during the data collection stage. This can be really helpful especially with longer data collection strategies to give an indication if the data is worth continuing with the collection.
Experiment strategy
The crystal is slowly rotated and photographed at every angle, allowing determination of the physical dimensions of the mounted crystal.
The detector then rotates to each calculated location and a frame of data is collected for each position. Whilst this is ongoing, AutoChem will attempt to solve the data, with the structure improving as each additional frame is collected. AutoChem knows nothing about the potential structure at this stage?
Frame collection. The data collection process can be seen on the top right. Despite only being around 1/4 of the way through, the AutoChem structure prediction has correctly identified the structure (middle right).
Approaching the end of the data collection with the structure resolved by AutoChem visible.
At the end of all the frames being recroded we have:
A movie of the crystal
An image file for each individual frame rodhypix
Unit cell data
HKL file
The AutoChem RES file
Plus the saved preexperiment data